I managed to take home one of Ommegang's more unique creations, "Wild at Heart," which features a howling wolf lording over a tiny squirrel on the label, but upon tasting kind of reminds me more of the David Lynch movie from the early 90's, or, oddly enough, maybe just the kind of whiskey drinking anyone could see (and join) Nicholas Cage doing at Nell's on 14th Street around that time. This is a thin, boozy flavored ale.
I'm not going to say medicinal, jarring or that in any way were their off flavors, but it was thin, tart, somewhat fruity. And I'd say this thoroughly "ethanolicious" or "ethanolacious" (depending on how you feel about the taste of a beer with a highly above average, ABV flavor, which carries up through one's nose to alert one's brain to the fact you need to "go slow"). It's an ale, made with wild yeast in primary fermentation, which is later hopped up with just enough Motueka and Topaz hops to remind you that it's beer, and not hard cider, or say, toilet wine, depending where life's lead you.
Delicious? Amazing? Certainly, if you enjoy high powered, thin Belgian style beer. If you enjoy thin, light, American commercial beer under say, 100 calories, so you can fit into your skinny jeans, you may be shocked and awed by this "audacious" beer (as the commercial description puts it) that this audacious brewery has harvested from the forests of Cooperstown, NY. This is a good time to note my strong sentiment that Ommegang does have some of the best advertising copy of all the beer label I've read.
Here's the Beijing Consensus on Ommegang's "Wild at Heart":
- http://beeradvocate.com/community/threads/ommegang-wild-at-heart-american-wild-ale.98667/
- http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/42/104109
- http://www.ratebeer.com/beer/ommegang-wild-at-heart/218172/
We're talking an "83" from the unwashed masses at Beer Advocate, and 3.5 out of 5 from Joe T's beer syndicate at Ratebeer.com. I think Wild at Heart is probably well better than all that noise, but who are any of us to argue with our crowed sourced reality, right?
And that opens a very interesting can of worms about accounting for the taste of beer as much as it does for accounting for tastes in wine.
Reasonable people may disagree on matters of taste, but I say the kind of feedback these beer rating sites provide are a damn sight better than the kind of subjective, cooked up reviews people turn to from Robert Parker's pen in "the bible of wine... blah blah blah", as the CBS Sunday Morning put it last week (citing a review of a wine in The Wine Spectator).
This is just a disruptive photo of Newburgh Brewery's epic, outstanding and extraordinary "Bitter English" that I recently drank, enjoyed and shot, along with the outside wall and their big inside beer hall (for detail, now see here, old boy: http://www.newburghbrewing.com/beers/bitter-english/)
And here's a Guardian story which makes brief mention of how
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/jun/23/wine-tasting-junk-science-analysis
Orley Ashenfelter's advise on accounting for the taste of wine:
http://www.liquidasset.com/tasting.html